LazySusan vs Claude Pro: Get Claude AND Everything Else
Why Limit Yourself to Anthropic?
Last updated: January 2025
92
Overall Score
74
Overall Score
Full disclosure: Claude is my favorite AI for writing. The way it handles nuance, follows complex instructions, and produces genuinely good prose is unmatched. Claude Pro at $25/month is legitimately worth it if Claude is your jam. But here's my issue: why should I ONLY have access to Claude when I could have Claude AND GPT-5 AND Gemini AND image generators AND video AI for the same investment? That's the LazySusan proposition.
Claude's Genuine Strengths
I'm not going to pretend Claude isn't special. Claude 4 Opus has the best writing quality of any AI—period. Its 300K context window is massive. It's the most 'thoughtful' AI, giving considered responses instead of confident-but-wrong answers. For long-form content, document analysis, and nuanced communication, Claude wins. Claude Pro gives you priority access, more usage, and the latest models. If writing is your main use case, Claude is genuinely the best choice.
But What About Everything Else?
Claude can't generate images. Claude can't make videos. Claude can't create music. Claude's real-time information access is limited. For coding, GPT-5 often edges it out. For research with citations, Perplexity is better. For Google Workspace integration, Gemini wins. Claude Pro is incredible at what it does, but what it does is narrower than you might think. LazySusan gives you Claude's strengths AND covers all the gaps with other best-in-class tools.
The Creative Workflow Problem
Here's a real scenario: You're creating content. You need Claude for the writing (great). You need images (Claude can't help). You need to research current events (Claude's not great here). You need to create a video (Claude definitely can't). With Claude Pro, you're constantly context-switching to other tools, other subscriptions, other interfaces. With LazySusan, you write in Claude, generate images in Midjourney, research in Perplexity, create video in Veo—all in one place.
Usage Limits Reality Check
Claude Pro has usage limits. Hit them and you're waiting or downgraded. Every Claude user has experienced the 'you've reached your limit' message at the worst possible time. LazySusan's approach is different—you have a token pool across all models. Use more Claude one day, more GPT another. The flexibility means you're never stuck waiting on one provider's arbitrary limits. Plus, if Claude's servers are slow (happens more than Anthropic admits), you can just switch to GPT.
The Honest Recommendation
If you literally only use AI for writing and nothing else, and you never hit Claude's limits, and you never need images or video or music or current information—Claude Pro is perfect for you. That describes maybe 5% of AI users. The other 95% of us want versatility. We want the best tool for each job. We want Claude for writing AND GPT for coding AND Midjourney for images AND Perplexity for research. LazySusan is for us.
Our Verdict
Claude Pro isn't overpriced—Claude is genuinely that good for writing. The question is whether 'just Claude' is enough for your AI needs. For most people, it isn't. LazySusan gives you full Claude access AND every other major AI model. You're not choosing between Claude and alternatives—you're getting Claude plus alternatives. It's not even a competition; it's just more.
Get Access to Both (and 50+ More)
Why choose one AI when you can have them all? LazySusan gives you LazySusan, Claude Pro, and 50+ other premium AI tools for one low price.