Skip to main content
All Comparisons

Kling AI vs Runway Gen-4: China's AI Video is Beating America

Nobody Wants to Admit It, But Kling is Actually Better

Last updated: January 2025

🇨🇳Kling AI

86

Overall Score

VS
🇺🇸Runway Gen-4

80

Overall Score

Here's an uncomfortable truth nobody in tech wants to talk about: Chinese AI video generation is really, really good. Kling, made by Kuaishou (China's TikTok competitor), is going toe-to-toe with Runway—and in some areas, it's winning. I've been testing both for commercial projects, and the results might surprise you.

Motion Quality & Physics

Runway has always struggled with physics. Weird gravity, objects passing through each other, that uncanny 'AI movement' we all recognize. Kling? The motion is noticeably more natural. Water flows correctly. Hair moves realistically. People walk without that floaty AI gait. I don't know what they're doing differently, but the physics simulation is significantly better. This was the first thing I noticed and it's consistent across hundreds of generations.

Kling AI92/100
Runway Gen-479/100
Winner: Kling AI

Video Length & Consistency

Kling generates up to 3-minute videos with remarkable consistency. Characters stay on-model, lighting remains coherent, and there's no mid-video 'drift' where things start morphing. Runway Gen-4 caps at shorter clips and even then, consistency wavers around the 30-second mark. For anything longer than a few seconds, you're doing multiple generations and stitching. Kling just... works longer.

Kling AI94/100
Runway Gen-476/100
Winner: Kling AI

Human Generation

This is where Runway still has an edge. Runway's human faces and expressions are more detailed and realistic. Kling can sometimes produce slightly 'waxy' skin or eyes that aren't quite right. For close-up human shots, Runway is safer. But for full-body motion and anything where the face isn't the focus? Kling wins because the movement is so much better.

Kling AI83/100
Runway Gen-489/100
Winner: Runway Gen-4

The Speed Difference

Kling is fast. Like, concerningly fast for how good it is. I'm getting 30-second clips in under 2 minutes. Runway can take 10+ minutes for similar quality. Time is money, and this speed advantage adds up if you're iterating on concepts or producing volume. Whatever infrastructure they're running in China, it's working.

Kling AI95/100
Runway Gen-470/100
Winner: Kling AI

Access & Censorship

Here's the catch: Kling has content restrictions that go beyond just safety. Anything political, anything that might be sensitive in China, gets blocked. For Western commercial use, this can be frustrating. Runway lets you make more varied content. And there are legitimate questions about data handling with Chinese AI companies. If that matters for your use case, it matters.

Kling AI65/100
Runway Gen-488/100
Winner: Runway Gen-4

Our Verdict

I know it's not fashionable to say, but Kling is legitimately impressive—often more impressive than the American alternatives we're supposed to prefer. For pure video quality and motion, it's currently ahead. The geopolitical concerns are real and you should factor them into your decision, but pretending the tech isn't good is just cope. We're in a real AI race now, and China is competing hard. Access both through LazySusan and decide for yourself.

Get Access to Both (and 50+ More)

Why choose one AI when you can have them all? LazySusan gives you Kling AI, Runway Gen-4, and 50+ other premium AI tools for one low price.